top of page

Ayurveda • Ashtanga Yoga • Somatic Coaching

The Gap Between Insight and Change #2 Why Knowing Isn't the Same as Shifting

  • Jun 8
  • 4 min read

You've probably read the books. Listened to the podcasts. Done the research.

You understand your patterns, your dosha - maybe better than most people understand theirs. You know about the nervous system, about stress responses, about why you do what you do. You've built a real framework for understanding yourself.


And yet something still hasn't quite shifted.


If that resonates - this episode is for you.



Knowledge is valuable. And it has a ceiling.


It makes complete sense that we reach for information when things feel hard, when we're struggeling. Understanding something gives us a sense of agency - a feeling of "I know what this is now, so this is less threatening." And there's real comfort in that.


But in my work, in Ayurveda consultations in Groningen and Eenrum, in somatic coaching, in the Ashtanga Mysore room - I see this pattern again and again. People who understand themselves deeply and still find the same reactions showing up. The same tightness. The same patterns playing out in relationships, in work, in the body - despite years of insight and self-knowledge.

Not because the understanding wasn't real. But because understanding alone has a ceiling. And for many people, that ceiling is exactly where they're stuck.


What Ayurveda and the Vedic tradition understood

In the Vedic tradition, the same tradition that gave us Ayurveda and yoga, there's a beautiful framework for the three stages of knowledge.


The first is hearing - receiving something with your whole being, not just your ears. Genuinely attending, with openness.


The second is contemplating - sitting with what you heard, letting it move you internally, asking how it relates to your lived experience. Bringing it into conversation with others - what in yoga we call satsang - so it doesn't stay surface level but reaches deeper layers, broadens in meaning, becomes richer.


The third is integration - when the teaching actually becomes embodied and we explore it in our daily lives, we gain actual felt experience with something. When you don't just know it, but live it.

Most of us stop at the first stage and mistake it for really knowing it.


In Ayurvedic terms, this relates to an excess of vata - too much mental movement, too much input and stimulation, a mind already spinning / fragmented being fed more information. What brings vata back into balance isn't more knowledge. It's grounding. Warmth. Repetition. Embodied rhythm. The opposite of more input.

Like increases like and the opposite bring balance as we know from Ayurveda. A mind already overstimulated by information needs less input and more anchoring experience. More landing.


What nervous system science adds

The autonomic nervous system, the part of us that regulates breath, heartbeat, digestion, and the stress response and so much more, operates largely below conscious awareness. It doesn't respond primarily to information, intention and (good to mention here: manifestation). It responds to felt experience. To repetition. To the body gradually learning that it is safe enough to settle.


This means that chronic stress, survival patterns, and dysregulation weren't created by wrong thinking alone. They were shaped by experience - by the body's repeated responses to what felt unsafe or overwhelming. And those shift through experience too. Not through understanding alone.

There's a name for the pattern of using knowledge to stay at a safe distance from what actually needs to shift: intellectualisation. It's one of the most common and least visible ways we avoid real change. It gives us the dopamine hit of "I understand now" ... without requiring us to actually feel or move through anything. The understanding evaporates because it was never integrated. It never dropped from the head into the body.


This isn't a criticism. It's a brilliant human response to stress and discomfort - and a very understandable one in a culture that rewards analytical thinking and treats the mind as the primary tool for solving everything.


What actually helps

This is not an argument against learning. It's an argument for learning in proportion.

One way I think about it: ninety-nine percent practice, one percent theory. Not the other way around.

When you receive attuned somatic coaching or when return to a practice regularly - whether that's yoga in Groningen, an Ayurveda-informed daily rhythm, or simply ten minutes of breath and body awareness - information starts to become experience. And experience is what creates lasting change. Because you're working directly with the autonomic nervous system, giving it new felt references for what settled and safe actually feels like.


That's why a somatic coaching session or a short daily practice done consistently reaches further than a library of books read once and shelved. Not because reading is bad. But because the nervous system needs felt experience to rewire. That's just how this works.


What this looks like in practice

In my work - whether that's Ayurveda consultations in Groningen and Eenrum, somatic coaching, or our Ashtanga Mysore program - this thread runs through everything.


Not more information to absorb. Not another framework to master. But guidance that supports gentle shift in the body, in the nervous system, in daily life.


That's what this mini-series is exploring. And that's what this whole podcast is here for.


Press play

This is the second episode in the mini-series From the Inside Out: On the body, the nervous system, and what creates lasting change. And if you've ever felt like you understand everything and somehow still feel the same, I think this one will land.



Curious about Ayurveda consultations or somatic coaching in Groningen or Eenrum, or about working together in another way? Find out more through the links above or reach out directly - I'd love to hear from you.



Comments


bottom of page